St. Lucia wins another round in arbitration case with Jack Grynberg’s company

17
St. Lucia wins another round in arbitration case with Jack Grynberg’s company
RSM Production Company (RSM) president Jack J. Grynberg (left) and Prime Minister Dr. Kenny Anthony
RSM Production Company (RSM) president Jack J. Grynberg (left) and Prime Minister Dr. Kenny Anthony


PRESS RELEASE –
The Government of Saint Lucia has won another round in the ongoing arbitration with RSM Production Corporation, the company owned by Jack Grynberg.

On August 13, 2014, the Arbitral Tribunal ordered RSM to post a guarantee of US$750,000 to ensure that it will pay Saint Lucia’s legal costs if it is ordered to do so at the end of the case. This is Saint Lucia’s second major success, following the Tribunal’s order on December 12, 2013, for RSM to pay all of the advances towards the administrative costs of the arbitration – which in all previous known cases have been paid 50% by each party.

Both of these orders are the first of their kinds in the history of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), which is administering the arbitration. The three arbitrators are independent of ICSID but are deciding the case under the ICSID Arbitration Rules, which are designed for disputes between host states and foreign investors. The Government is pleased to have achieved these unique successes.

The orders concern two categories of costs. The December 2013 order related to “administrative” costs, namely the fees to ICSID for administering the proceeding and the fees and expenses of the arbitrators. The parties pay those costs in advances, which they replenish as the advances are used up. Each side usually pays half of the advances, but RSM has been ordered to pay all of the advances and to refund an advance that Saint Lucia had already made.

The recent order relates to Saint Lucia’s own costs. RSM must now post security because of the concern that, if the Tribunal later orders RSM to reimburse Saint Lucia, RSM will fail to do so.

The Tribunal’s order summarizes the parties’ claims and defenses, saying that the case arises from an offshore petroleum exploration contract. The Tribunal noted that, “according to [RSM’s] position, boundary disputes developed, affecting the exploration area, in particular in relation to Martinique, Barbados and Saint Vincent, which allegedly prevented [RSM] from initiating exploration.” RSM also claims that former Prime Minister Stephenson King signed a three-year extension to the contract but then retrieved the document before it could be delivered to RSM. RSM claims that the extension is valid, even though RSM never received it. RSM has asked the Tribunal to declare that the exploration contract is still in full force and effect.

In reply, Saint Lucia maintains that the Agreement “has expired or is at least not enforceable and therefore Saint Lucia has no obligation [to RSM].”

The latest order does not determine which party is correct on these matters. It relates only to the costs of the proceeding.

The Tribunal noted that RSM had had a history of non-payment of costs awarded against it. The Tribunal said it was “satisfied that also in this proceeding, there is a material risk that [RSM] would not reimburse [Saint Lucia] for its incurred costs, be it due to [RSM’s] unwillingness or its inability to comply with its payment obligations.”

Moreover, RSM admitted that it had received funding from a third party, and this “supports the Tribunal’s concern that [RSM] will not comply with a costs award rendered against it, since, in the absence of security or guarantees being offered, it is doubtful whether the third party will assume responsibility for honoring such an award. Against this background, the Tribunal regards it as unjustified to burden [Saint Lucia] with the risk emanating from the uncertainty as to whether or not the unknown third party will be willing to comply with a potential costs award in [Saint Lucia’s] favor.”

The Tribunal noted that its ruling does not mean that “it considers [Saint Lucia’s] defence on the merits to be successful.

The Tribunal therefore ordered RSM to “post security for costs in the form of an irrevocable bank guarantee for USD 750,000 within thirty days of [its] decision.” If RSM fails to provide the bank guarantee, Saint Lucia can request the Tribunal “to cancel the hearing date” on the merits. The Government may, of course, choose to seek remedies other than postponing the hearing if RSM does not comply.

The hearing on the merits of the case is scheduled for February 2015.

(0)(0)

No posts to display

17 COMMENTS

  1. "The Tribunal noted that, “according to [RSM’s] position, boundary disputes developed, affecting the exploration area, in particular in relation to Martinique, Barbados and Saint Vincent, which allegedly prevented [RSM] from initiating exploration.” RSM also claims that former Prime Minister Stephenson King signed a three-year extension to the contract but then retrieved the document before it could be delivered to RSM. RSM claims that the extension is valid, even though RSM never received it."

    This was in the body of the document.....

    (0)(0)

  2. For St Lucia to stay trouble free (IMF, Grynberg, Rocohmel, Blackbay Investment, and so on and so on) we should keep both Allen and Kenny far from the Prime ministership of this country - Two birds of a feather flock together.
    Keeping my fingers cross that we escape this Grynberg affair.

    (0)(0)

  3. This is the mentality of some of the so call ST. Lucians who think they are so educated and know it all. When I read the comments posted by these fools. That is why Jesus called the Pharasees hypocrites. When they know it all there is no way they can reasons because their mind and facility are like walls. You can be educated and not have an inch of wisdom. This is a God given gift. Kenny will quit politic and people will still have things to say about him.

    (3)(0)

  4. Dr. Kenny D Anthony...working for the People of this Great Nation. 🙂

    Hip hip hip Hooorayyy
    Hip Hip Hip Hooorayyy 🙂

    (0)(0)

    • After he put us in the problem he better make sure we win cause if we lose we have to pay $500 Million US Dollars to Grynberg!

      (0)(0)

      • How did Dr. Kenny D Anthony put us in this situation?
        Are you so colour blind that you never realized that we have been this way for the past 18 years?
        And that successive governments were keeping it "Hush Hush" just to win seats and remain in power?

        Are you sure you live on this Island?

        Even Micheal Chastenat knows that man. smh.

        (0)(0)

  5. Don't celebrate just yet. These early rounds are petty and St. Lucia is expected to win. JG is putting on the boxing glove, so expect some drama and embarrassment for the St. Lucian government.

    (0)(1)

  6. nice one for rick wayne he has been pushing for answers for years ,lets hear from him now ,talk nah rick

    (0)(0)

    • Do we know anything about the case? No.So why should he tell us anything when he have refused to tell us about the case itself?

      (0)(0)

  7. St.Lucia is in a lose, lose situation; for the longer this drags on, the cloudier the investment atmosphere here remains. No foreign investor wants to invest in such a cloudy and uncertain atmosphere.

    (0)(0)

  8. In the first instance, who create the first contract or who made the first deal. Unlawful deals always brings confusion and shame back on the parties. I hope it is not tooooo late to learn from mistakes.

    (0)(0)

    • The Mad Cow responds to your comment with disdain! Y'all are fixated on the "contract being unlawful" but no one has yet to prove that it is or was so. Y'all were in Government and NOTHING! NOT EVEN AN INVESTIGATION! So, take the medication as it is served . . . St. Lucia has won and will continue to win!

      (0)(0)

Comments are closed.