St. Lucia ranks lowly in how effectively children can use the courts to defend their rights

St. Lucia ranks lowly in how effectively children can use the courts to defend their rights

PRESS RELEASE – St Lucia has been ranked as 110th in the world on how effectively children can use the courts to defend their rights according to new research from Child Rights International Network (CRIN).

The new report, ‘Rights, Remedies and Representation’, takes into account whether children can bring lawsuits when their rights are violated, the legal resources available to them, the practical considerations for taking legal action and whether international law on children’s rights is applied in national courts.

The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) is not formally part of national law in Saint Lucia. Since ratification of the CRC, attempts have been made to incorporate its provisions into domestic law through amendments and new laws have been adopted to comply with the Convention.

Many laws are still contrary to the principles of the principles of the convention and it cannot be directly enforced in the courts. Despite this the CRC can be and has been cited for guidance by national and regional courts with jurisdiction over Saint Lucia.

Under the Civil Procedure Rules, children through their representatives, are entitled to bring civil cases in the courts to challenge violations of their rights and may also bring constitutional complaints or judicial review proceedings. The legal system is noted for being slow, leading to a backlog of cases and long stays in pre-trial detention.

Achieving access to justice for children is a work in progress and the report represents a snapshot of the ways children’s rights are protected across the world. The report condenses findings from 197 country reports, researched with the support of hundreds of lawyers and NGOs and is intended to help countries improve access to justice for children nationally.
Director of CRIN, Veronica Yates, said: “While the report highlights many examples of systems poorly suited to protecting children’s rights there are also plenty of people using the courts to effectively advance children’s rights.

“Our ranking represents how well States allow children access to justice rather than how well their rights are enshrined. However, it is hard to ignore how many countries with deplorable human rights records are on the lower end of the ranking for children’s access to justice.”

In the foreword of the report the chairperson of the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child Benyam Dawit Mezmur said: “The Committee welcomes this research and already envisages its concrete contribution to its various engagements with State Parties.

“Child rights standards in international instruments do not mean much for the lived reality of children if they are not implemented. In particular, if the fundamental rights of children are violated, it is critical that children or those acting on their behalf have the recourse, both in law and in practice, to obtain a remedy to cease, prohibit and/or compensate for the violation.

“I hope this study is only the beginning of a new shift in making access to justice for children a priority that will enable other rights to be fulfilled.”


No posts to display


  1. Adults can't use the courts effectively what hope have our children got?

    The whole court system needs a major rehaul.


  2. Too many macos in our society who are being shielded by upper echelon people. They prefer to deal with these issues by making 'rangement'. Pay off the parents or pay a ticket for the victim to disappear in New York or London. If it gets to court witnesses eventually get fed up with missing work to appear time and time again at a court to have the case adjourned more times than you have days in a year. Police officers investigating cases lose files, try to discourage victims, or just do not follow up on investigations, or the biggest insult of them all is the disappearing of critical evidence or its contamination.

    And with all of this happening over and over again throughout the years there are no consequences or sanctions for those who continue to fail the victims. This is why the US, EU, French, British, and God knows who else is on our backs about the malfunctioning judicial system and sordid behaviour with IMPACS, LAMBIRDS, Gobat, Verlinda Joseph, Valerie Lorde, ... and other cases. Our society festers and all the politicians do is pay lip service to the critical issues of the country.

    St. Lucia is in a mess that stinks to high heaven and any conversation on the matter will cause officials to invoke every excuse imaginable under the sun. Somebody is gonna squeeze us real hard pretty soon. Watch and see.


  3. If the adults are not mature enough to do that for themselves, it is going to be very difficult to gain that for the youth. It is matters like these that a more forward looking national youth body should be addressing.


Comments are closed.