SLP expresses disappointment on UWP government healthcare statement


 Share This On:


(PRESS RELEASE VIA SNO) – The Saint Lucia Labour Party is extremely disappointed with the presentation of plans by the UWP Government on the future of the health care system in Saint Lucia.

The address to the nation on July 4th by the government was a poorly scripted Public Relations stunt void of content on the way forward to seriously resolving our healthcare crisis.

Nothing was said which made the citizens of Saint Lucia any wiser provided or comfort that the UWP Government is serious and ready to solve the health care crisis facing the nation.

The Saint Lucia Labour Party notes the following in an initial response to the comments by the Prime Minister.

In contrast to what the Prime Minister said, the decision to proceed with the reconstruction of the hospital on the existing site was made by the UWP government in August 2011 by the then Prime Minister Stephenson King. This is clearly shown in a document of the House tabled on 4th April, 2018 named “St. Jude Hospital Reconstruction Project Handover Report” Page 18.

In contrast to what the Prime Minister said, the UWP government was presented with several options for financing of the Health Sector in Saint Lucia. These were documented in a paper entitled “Development of a Sustainable Financing Mechanism for the Saint Lucia Health Sector” prepared by health experts and financed by the European Union. It is untrue to say a decision was taken by the Saint Lucia Labour Party government to increase NIC contributions.

The Saint Lucia Labour Party invited the then Opposition to work in a bi-partisan committee on Health Care financing. The UWP were non-cooperative.

The Prime Minister failed to explain how the proposed National Health Insurance be financed by his Administration. The Nation still awaits details.

The Prime Minister chose to ignore the fact that the Saint Lucia Labour had already begun the implementation of Universal Health Care with the provision of medication for diabetic and high blood pressure patients

In June 2016, the government was in possession of a complete inventory of the equipment available for St. Jude. It is as a result of their carelessness and inaction that they allowed two years to elapse and failed to make use of that equipment.

There is still no clarity on how the existing buildings on the St. Jude site will be utilized. What does the Prime Minister mean by “build a new wing using core facilities”? Does that mean that some buildings will be demolished or put to alternative use? Experts have opined that the East Wing on the site can be refurbished and occupied by February next year. The government is advised to follow that path and ensure that patients and workers are moved out of the George Odlum Stadium to a safe environment in the shortest possible time.

The present plans of the Government is to build a new wing which will be sized to accommodate the present staff and patients at the George Odlum Stadium and to abandon all the other buildings that have been constructed.

This decision is contrary even to the recommendations contained in their $ 1.0 Million Technical Audit which clearly stated that the facility should be complete. It is of note that the Terms of

Reference for that technical audit consultancy stated that the Consultant was to provide a methodology to complete the hospital in one year. The following is an extract: “The preparation of all technical documentation required for the preparation of bidding and contract documentation to complete the project.

This will include the methodology for completion of construction using a phased approach and for commissioning operation of the facility within 12 months.” How does one explain that a Government commissions a consultancy to develop a methodology to complete and commission the facility within 12 months, the Interim Report concluded that the facility should be completed and two years later that Government decides to abandon the facility? This is nothing short of recklessness and an insult to the people of Saint Lucia.

The government clearly has no clear pathway or cohesive plan to improve healthcare service delivery in an accessible and affordable way for Saint Lucians and visitors.

The idea that Private Public Partnership and unclear Joint Ventures are the solution to government’s lack of direction and political posturing is unacceptable.

The Saint Lucia Labour Party calls on the government to enter into meaningful dialogue with all partners including the Saint Lucia Medical and Dental Association so that the best solutions and most affordable and accessible outcomes can be found to solving the health crisis in Saint Lucia.

A detailed response with verifiable facts to the government’s pronouncements will be forthcoming. The Saint Lucia Labour Party will continue its consultation, dialogue and mobilization of Saint Lucians around the deepening healthcare crisis which had been made more confusing by the government’s pronouncements.


St. Lucia News Online firmly discourages any commentary or statements that are libelous, disruptive in nature or incites others to violate our Terms of Use. Any submissions made on our comment section, are solely the views of the individual and not from St. Lucia News Online.


  1. That is the most positive position that SLP has taken on health care after squandering millions from donors. What a bunch of two-faced @#$$##@##$$.


  2. What happen? You'll were sleeping when you'll were in office. You'll just got up?


  3. I think I listened to a different broadcast than the person who wrote this article either that or there is something wrong with my hearing. At no time did I hear the panel say they were going to '..... abandon all the other buildings that have been constructed. '
    I heard they were going to use the buildings that could be used and build another wing to replace the building(s) the were unfit for purpose. I even thought they said they'd use the once not fit for purpose for other activities.

    "The Prime Minister chose to ignore the fact that the Saint Lucia Labour had already begun the implementation of Universal Health Care with the provision of medication for diabetic and high blood pressure patients".
    Why did he have to mention it? That's not what the broadcast was about.

    It's annoying when people object for the sake of objecting, with no real substance.

    What I want to know with this PPP/Joint Venture, who will own what and for how long? What percentage of profits will the government get? I don't care who operates or invest in the hospital. I just want to know that at the end of the day it belongs to St Lucians and the profits are not all going into private bank accounts.


This article was posted in its entirety as received by This media house does not correct any spelling or grammatical error within press releases and commentaries. The views expressed therein are not necessarily those of, its sponsors or advertisers.