Pierre says Guyana’s no confidence vote “a lesson for prime ministers”

By CMC

 Share This On:

Opposition Leader Phillip J. Pierre

(CMC) – Leader of the main opposition St. Lucia Labour Party (SLP) Philip J. Pierre has pointed to recent developments in Guyana where the government lost a no confidence vote in the national assembly – saying it is a lesson for prime ministers.

“What it shows is that governments – prime ministers must understand that winning elections does not mean they have the support of the majority of the people,” Pierre told reporters.

The SLP leader said he started the trend here, when in September, he announced to the world that he would file a no confidence motion against the governance of Prime Minister Allen Chastanet.

He recalled that many people thought the move was superfluous.

However, the Castries East Member of Parliament (MP) said he was doing his duty as leader of the parliamentary opposition, explaining that there was nothing personal in his no-confidence motion bid.

But Pierre observed that in terms of policy, he is convinced that Prime Minister Chastanet’s decisions are not in the best interests of this country.

According to Pierre, his no confidence move created a domino effect.

“Guyana followed; St Kitts – and I am sure many other opposition parties will follow the lead that we took in St Lucia,” he told journalists.

Against the backdrop of the success of the no confidence vote against the Guyana government, Pierre said it also means that prime ministers must not live in “glass houses”.

He asserted they cannot believe that because they are prime ministers they can be on their “high horses”, victimise and push people around or treat them with disgust.

“They must understand that they are prime ministers at the will of the people and they hold office because the majority of elected members voted for them,” Pierre stated.

“I guess it is a lesson to all prime ministers, those on their high horses, and those who believe that they can tell people ‘continue braying’; I hope they understand where the power ultimately lies.”

Pierre declared that he was “very excited” about the no confidence motion he has tabled against Prime Minister Chastanet whose ruling United Workers Party holds an 11-6 majority in parliament.

“I hope three ministers will use their conscience and support the motion,” Pierre said.

Admitting that he was not aware of the reasons why Guyana government MP Charrandass Persaud voted against the country’s coalition government of which he was part, Pierre noted that some politicians have a conscience.

The success of the no confidence motion in Guyana means that elections must be held in 90 days.

Persaud, who brought down the administration of President David Granger, has been labelled a traitor, but he declared that in Friday evening’s shock outcome, he voted with his conscience.

Guyana’s opposition People’s Progressive Party (PPP) said it was emboldened by the coalition’s poor showing in November’s midterm elections.

In regard to when the no confidence motion here will be debated in parliament, Pierre said he was awaiting word from the speaker of the House, who indicated that he was seeking legal advice.

“I am waiting for him and the result of his legal advice,” Pierre added.

(3)(13)
Copyright 2019 St. Lucia News Online. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed.

5 comments

  1. Grant him that. Pierre does know how to make noise. To the vast majority of SLP low-information processing supporters, Pierre's NOISE is the highest form of distilled universal wisdom. But sacarsm is not here intended.

    (0)(0)
  2. Advice to you Mr. Pierre, with great respect. I don't know who is whispering sweet little nothings
    in your political ears, but do consider; there's no comparison in what's going on in Guyana to St. Lucia.

    (1)(0)
  3. Pierre is in an alternative universe, living vicariously in Guyana. But Santa has no political presents for him this Christmas.

    (8)(1)
  4. The trouble with wishful-thinking immature politicians is that they learn the wrong lessons from events. Know your history. Know your politics. Apply intelligence to complex issues. Think with your head and not your emotions.

    Guyana had a coalition government. Just as in Europe, such governments are factional and fractional. They are very fragile arrangements. Therefore, they break up quite easily.

    What is missing here is a profound understanding of the historically racial and ethnic politics of Guyana. Much blood has been spilt regarding this in the past. The resulting brain drain in Guyana is the result of so many educated Guyanese are living abroad.

    Moreover, with a one-seat majority, the government was sitting on a political knife edge. The Sword of Damocles was always hanging by a thread above the PM's head. Good governance or bad governance would not change anything.

    UWP does not seem to be rattled by any internal dissent. Besides, it has a comfortable majority over the Opposition. It would take a political drift back to the SLP by the voting population, plus UWP MPs turning against the current PM to carry the vote from a motion of no confidence in the government, in order for a wishful toppling to succeed.

    (10)(2)
  5. Great job! Opposing... Best position currently for the labour party... However currently radical ideas and vision is needed... The norm cannot be continued.... Time to get out of our comfort zones... Change is here... And sadly St. Lucian's are not ready for change.....

    (6)(9)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.