LUCELEC’s statement on negotiations with the CSA

By LUCELEC

 Share This On:

lucelec-twSTATEMENT – St. Lucia Electricity Services Limited (LUCELEC) and the Civil Service Association (CSA) representing LUCELEC’s line staff met with the Labour Department on Monday, April 3, 2017.

The meeting was an attempt to find a resolution to the impasse between LUCELEC and the CSA on the implementation of a grade structure for the line staff. The proposed grade structure is in keeping with what has been implemented for the rest of the staff.

Monday’s meeting was unable to arrive at a resolution of the issue. The Labour Department has since advised the parties that it will recommend to the Minister for Labour, Honourable Stephenson King, that the matter be referred to the Labour Tribunal for its consideration and decision.

Toward the end of last year, the CSA had written to the Minister for Labour giving notice of a dispute between the CSA and LUCELEC and of their intention to take strike action. The Minister for Labour met with the parties in January and asked them to seek to resolve the outstanding matters between them, and had given them until March 31, 2017 to do so. Thereafter he would meet with the parties again.

There were five issues in dispute – the implementation of a grade structure for the line staff that is in keeping with what has been implemented for the rest of the staff, compensation for Live Line work, a change in the Company’s Merit Pay Policy and Appraisal System, and the retirement age.

The parties have come to agreement on the compensation for Live Line work. So that matter is no longer in dispute. The parties had different interpretations of the retirement age but have agreed to allow this matter to go to Tribunal for a ruling that would be clear to all and binding. The parties have also agreed on a way forward for further discussions on the Merit Policy and Appraisal System. The implementation of the grade structure remains unresolved.

Both parties agree to the fundamentals of a new grade structure, the salary ranges, and to the effective date being January 2011. The main difference is that the Union wants the salary ranges to include 15 discreet steps that employees are pegged to, while LUCELEC’s position is that the salary ranges have no discreet steps in between, as obtains for all the other grades in the Company.

At the heart of the issue is that each side believes the other has reneged on what had been agreed to via exchanges of letters during negotiations on the 2011 – 2013 collective agreement.

LUCELEC hopes that the Tribunal can deal with this matter expeditiously so that the parties can achieve closure on this issue.

(0)(19)
This article was posted in its entirety as received by stlucianewsonline.com. This media house does not correct any spelling or grammatical error within press releases and commentaries. The views expressed therein are not necessarily those of stlucianewsonline.com, its sponsors or advertisers.

3 comments

  1. Happy to see Lucelec staff fight for what they deserved, more st.lucians should do the same so companies wouldn't take advantage of us.

    (2)(1)
  2. LUCELEC is a highly respected monopoly company and I am extremely disappointed with what I am hearing. The staff seem to be very efficient and competent in what they do. I always admire the guys on the pole. They are very hardworking. They should be treated better than that. As a matter of fact the workers are the asset of the Lucelec. In other words they make the company what it is today. That MD is a disgrace. He should be fired.

    (1)(0)
  3. Increases were given to the Senior management team , as well as the board of directors. Furthermore the MD drives around in a brand spanking new Toyota Land Cruiser prado and grade one staff are disrespected and tossed around like filth. You will surely pay for your greed Trevor....

    (15)(1)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.