Juffali argues he already provides supermodel ex-wife with £70k monthly

11
Juffali argues he already provides supermodel ex-wife with £70k monthly
Mandatory Credit: Photo by Richard Young/REX Shutterstock (1169650am) Christina Estrada-Juffali and Walid Juffali Grace Kelly Style Icon, Victoria and Albert Museum, London, Britain - 15 April 2010
Mandatory Credit: Photo by Richard Young/REX Shutterstock (1169650am)  Christina Estrada-Juffali and Walid Juffali  Grace Kelly Style Icon, Victoria and Albert Museum, London, Britain - 15 April 2010
Mandatory Credit: Photo by Richard Young/REX Shutterstock Christina Estrada-Juffali and Walid Juffali at Victoria and Albert Museum, London, Britain – 15 April 2010.

THE TELEGRAPH – A Saudi billionaire seeking diplomatic immunity from multi-million pound divorce proceedings has argued that at £70k a month he is already providing for his supermodel ex-wife.

International businessman Sheikh Walid Juffali, who has an estimated fortune of £4 billion, divorced former Pirelli calendar girl Christina Estrada in Saudi Arabia but is now facing a suit in London’s Crown Court.

Dr Juffali, 60, claims he has made “generous” provision for his ex-wife, giving her a property in Beverly Hills, California, paying her 100,000 US dollars (£70,700) per month and meeting all the expenses of their 13-year-old daughter.

However Ms Estrada, 53, says Dr Juffali, 60, obtained their divorce without her knowledge and is demanding a financial settlement for their 13-year marriage.

Dr Juffali was appointed as the permanent representative for St Lucia to the London headquarters of the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) in April 2014.

The post grants Dr Juffali diplomatic immunity – exempting him from the UK laws – and may effectively grant him protection from having to settle Ms Estrada’s demands.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE

(4)(12)

No posts to display

11 COMMENTS

  1. MATURE MINDS? They discuss concepts, ideas and issues!

    AVERAGE MINDS? They discuss events.

    SMALL MINDS? They only discuss people.
    ==========================================
    Then ...
    "He who knows and knows that he knows, you FOLLOW him.
    He who knows, and knows NOT that he KNOWS, you LEAD him.
    But, he who knows NOT, and knows NOT that he knows NOT; you SHUN him."

    Check out our so-called leading politicians against what is up there. Many are weighed in balance and are found wanting?

    I know. I know. Don'f tell me. To count, you do not have enough fingers.

    (1)(0)

  2. The court case isn't over yet. We don't know how long he will be paying this £70k/mth for, it could be just until the daughter is of adult age, 18. We don't know yet.

    He definitely used St Lucia to hold on to his billions.

    (11)(0)

    • The mentality of the majority population is to engage in political prostitution. Votes for $100 bills, beers and chicken legs. The world will pity us. It will take a long time after this alleged PIMPING PARTY has left the stage, to reclaim and regain our international integrity and respect.

      (0)(2)

  3. All UWPs with blinders, come out to party. This is the last boarding call. This matter is about to go into oblivion soon (just like PetroCaribe did).

    Remember, I have told you "the UK/EU will take no action against St. Lucia. What train will you (UWPs with blinders) hop onto next?

    (5)(23)

  4. as you open your big mouth can you kindly put together a small project of $500,000.00 EC so that it can employee about 10 ppl all year round.

    Since we are not to beg please help your country.

    Thank you in advance for your cooperation.

    (6)(1)

    • ????? January 19, 2016 at 5:29 PM
      Let us pause here for a second and ask the following questions based on the limited info government has dished out and what we have read on Daily Mail and the Telegraph.
      At this point we must admit that majority of us don't know the reason for his appointment.
      We have read that the wife was upset when she found out about the young girl he married and started divorce proceedings which were stalled when Juffali claimed he made a mistake. We also read that once his diplomatic status was granted he proceeded to divorce her.

      I have read that persons have labeled her a gold digger.
      But in the absence of knowing the reasons for his appointment and based on lack of info, one can assume that it appears that the appointment was very strategic because of the divorce proceedings.

      If we are to assume just as others have assumed the lady is a gold digger, that the appointment was a very strategic one to avoid a large pay out, my question is this:
      Which one is worse?
      -An assumed gold digger who we are assuming did not help her husband financially or emotionally etc?????
      -Or a man who strategically sought the assistance of a third world nation for his own personal gain while he married a young girl who could have been his daughter.

      In my books this should be argued based on principal. To think that if she is getting a generous amount and living in the 90210 zip code then she should be grateful is wrong.
      If she is going after her husband out of spite then this is just as wrong.
      The beef is between husband and wife and it is not my place to call the woman a gold digger. We don't know what was being said in the bedroom to warrant such an action by the wife despite his "generous" offer.

      My issue as a St.Lucian with all of this remains:
      Was my country used by the rich and famous to circumvent certain things?????
      That is what is most upsetting to me. If this is so, in my books that is blatant disrespect.
      There are some things money can't buy.

      To tell me the man is a billionaire as touted by Kenny on the market steps is pure disgrace as it gives the impression that we are begging for crumbs and no matter what or who, once the persons have money it is all good and we should be grateful.
      That kind out mentality is why we will always be enslaved.

      - See more at: https://www.stlucianewsonline.com/juffali-argues-he-already-provides-supermodel-ex-wife-with-70k-monthly/#sthash.qQ1Ttbjo.dpuf

      PLEASE ADVISED MY REPLY WAS TO YOU MR/MRS ????????????

      (7)(0)

  5. Please tell me what qualified this Juffali to become a St. Lucian diplomat? IS it because he claimed that" HE FELL IN LOVE WITH ST. LUCIA?" as stated by the Prime Minister? What kind of lame pathetic reason is this?

    (31)(1)

  6. Let us pause here for a second and ask the following questions based on the limited info government has dished out and what we have read on Daily Mail and the Telegraph.
    At this point we must admit that majority of us don't know the reason for his appointment.
    We have read that the wife was upset when she found out about the young girl he married and started divorce proceedings which were stalled when Juffali claimed he made a mistake. We also read that once his diplomatic status was granted he proceeded to divorce her.

    I have read that persons have labeled her a gold digger.
    But in the absence of knowing the reasons for his appointment and based on lack of info, one can assume that it appears that the appointment was very strategic because of the divorce proceedings.

    If we are to assume just as others have assumed the lady is a gold digger, that the appointment was a very strategic one to avoid a large pay out, my question is this:
    Which one is worse?
    -An assumed gold digger who we are assuming did not help her husband financially or emotionally etc?????
    -Or a man who strategically sought the assistance of a third world nation for his own personal gain while he married a young girl who could have been his daughter.

    In my books this should be argued based on principal. To think that if she is getting a generous amount and living in the 90210 zip code then she should be grateful is wrong.
    If she is going after her husband out of spite then this is just as wrong.
    The beef is between husband and wife and it is not my place to call the woman a gold digger. We don't know what was being said in the bedroom to warrant such an action by the wife despite his "generous" offer.

    My issue as a St.Lucian with all of this remains:
    Was my country used by the rich and famous to circumvent certain things?????
    That is what is most upsetting to me. If this is so, in my books that is blatant disrespect.
    There are some things money can't buy.

    To tell me the man is a billionaire as touted by Kenny on the market steps is pure disgrace as it gives the impression that we are begging for crumbs and no matter what or who, once the persons have money it is all good and we should be grateful.
    That kind out mentality is why we will always be enslaved.

    (37)(4)

Comments are closed.