Brexit deal essentially ‘impossible’ after Johnson-Merkel call

Brexit deal essentially ‘impossible’ after Johnson-Merkel call
Johnson (left) and Merkel
Johnson (left) and Merkel

(BBC) — A No 10 source has said a Brexit deal is “essentially impossible” after a call between the PM and Angela Merkel.

Boris Johnson and the German chancellor spoke earlier about the proposals he put forward to the EU – but the source said she made clear a deal based on them was “overwhelmingly unlikely”.

Mrs Merkel’s office said it would not comment on “private” conversations.

But the BBC’s Adam Fleming said there was “scepticism” within the EU that Mrs Merkel would have used such language.

And the EU’s top official warned the UK against a “stupid blame game”.

President of the European Council Donald Tusk sent a public tweet to Mr Johnson, telling him “the future of Europe and the UK” was at stake.

With efforts to get a deal by the end of the month on an apparent knife edge, Boris Johnson and his Irish counterpart Leo Varadkar have said they hope to meet later in the week.

But following talks in Downing Street, the president of the European Parliament said there had been “no progress” and MEPs would not agree to a compromise deal “at any price”.

David Sassoli said the UK’s new proposed customs arrangements for Northern Ireland were a “long way from something to which the Parliament could agree”.

Amid frantic diplomatic manoeuvring in European capitals, details of a call earlier on Tuesday between the UK and German leaders have reignited tensions across the continent.

The No 10 source suggested Mrs Merkel told her counterpart the only way to break the deadlock was for Northern Ireland to stay in the customs union and for it to permanently accept EU single market rules on trade in goods.

This, the source said, marked a shift in Germany’s approach and made a negotiated deal “essentially impossible”.

The prime minister’s official spokesman said the conversation had been “frank” but denied the negotiations were all but over.

Norbert Rottgen, an ally of the chancellor who is chair of the Bundestag’s Foreign Affairs Committee, said there was “no new German position”.

He tweeted that a deal based on the UK’s latest proposals had “been unrealistic from the beginning and yet the EU has been willing to engage”.

The BBC’s Europe editor Katya Adler said it was “no secret” Berlin found the UK’s proposed new customs solution for Northern Ireland problematic.

While Berlin had not given up hope, she said the chances of a no-deal exit were rising again as the nature of the UK’s proposals made any compromise very difficult.

Under Mr Johnson’s proposals, which he calls a “broad landing zone” for a new deal with the EU:

* Northern Ireland would leave the EU’s customs union alongside the rest of the UK, at the start of 2021

* But Northern Ireland would continue to apply EU legislation relating to agricultural and other products, if the Northern Ireland Assembly approves

* This arrangement could, in theory, continue indefinitely, but the consent of Northern Ireland’s politicians would have to be sought every four years

* Customs checks on goods traded between the UK and EU would be “decentralised”, with paperwork submitted electronically and only a “very small number” of physical checks

* These checks should take place away from the border itself, at business premises or at “other points in the supply chain”

The UK’s chief negotiator, David Frost, is continuing to meet EU counterparts in Brussels, but the No 10 source said Tuesday morning’s phone call had been a “clarifying moment”, adding: “Talks in Brussels are close to breaking down.”

They said the UK was not willing to move away from the principle of providing a consent mechanism for Northern Ireland, or the plan for leaving the customs union, and if the EU did not accept those principles, “that will be that” and the plan moving forward would be an “obstructive” strategy towards Brussels.

They also accused the EU of being “willing to torpedo the Good Friday agreement” – the peace process agreed in Northern Ireland in the 1990s – by refusing to accept Mr Johnson’s proposals.

Updating MPs on contingency planning for a no-deal exit, minister Michael Gove said there was still “every chance” of a deal but the EU must engage with the UK’s plans.

“In setting out these proposals, we’ve moved – it is now time for the EU to move too,” he said.

Ireland’s Tánaiste (Deputy Prime Minister), Simon Coveney, said a deal was still possible but “not any at cost” – and the UK must accept it had “responsibilities” on the island of Ireland.

The UK and Irish leaders spoke on the phone for 40 minutes on Tuesday, after which No 10 said both sides “strongly reiterated” their desire to reach a deal.

But Labour’s shadow Brexit secretary Sir Keir Starmer told MPs the government was “intent on collapsing the talks and engaging in a reckless blame game”.

“The stark reality is the government put forward proposals that were designed to fail,” he said, adding that it was “beneath contempt” that, according to a Downing Street source reported by the Spectator, the UK could withdraw security co-operation from other EU countries if it were forced to remain beyond 31 October.

The PM has insisted the UK will leave the EU on that date, with or without a deal.

That is despite legislation passed by MPs last month, known as the Benn Act, which requires Mr Johnson to write to the EU requesting a further delay if no deal is signed off by Parliament by 19 October – unless MPs agree to a no-deal Brexit.

The key focus of the new UK plans is to replace the so-called backstop – the policy negotiated by Theresa May and the EU to prevent a hard border returning to the island of Ireland – which has long been a sticking point.

After presenting them, government sources hoped the sides might be able to enter an intense 10-day period of talks almost immediately, but a number of senior EU figures, including Irish Taoiseach Leo Varadkar, warned they did not form the basis for deeper negotiations – even if they believed a deal could still be done.

Mr Varadkar has warned the Johnson plan could actually undermine that principle by giving one party in Northern Ireland a veto over what happens to the country as a whole.


No posts to display


  1. Britain - once ruled the world - the u.s. is now the pretender. They're both loaded with massive atomic
    weapons - a dangerous mix, but I'm more worried about the narcissist in the Casa-Blanca. One false move
    and we all go up in dust. We should all pray for the leaders with such weapons to use God given wisdom.
    One have already claimed to have the superior wisdom of all men today; God help us and change the path
    of such boastful utterance. Lord we know the time is short, can you extend it so your wisdom can reign.


Comments are closed.