Amber Guyger’s attorneys want her murder trial for killing Botham Jean moved to new venue

Amber Guyger’s attorneys want her murder trial for killing Botham Jean moved to new venue
Amber Guyger shot Botham Jean in his apartment in The Cedars neighborhood south of downtown Dallas.
Botham Jean (left) and Amber Guyger

(DALLASNEWS.COM) – Fired Dallas police Officer Amber Guyger’s attorneys asked a judge Monday to move her murder trial out of Dallas, citing “media hysteria” surrounding the fatal shooting of Botham Jean.

Guyger, 30, killed Jean on Sept. 6 inside his apartment when she was off-duty but still in uniform. Authorities said she mistook his apartment for her own. She said his door was unlocked and she thought Jean, a 26-year-old accountant from St. Lucia, was a burglar.

Guyger’s attorneys, Robert Rogers, Toby Shook and Michael Mowla, argued in their court filing that the “publicity surrounding this case has been prejudicial and inflammatory.” Jean’s death was international news and area media outlets published a stream of stories after his death. Guyger’s attorneys cited 297 articles about Guyger and Jean in their motion.

Whether potential jurors are qualified to sit on the jury isn’t about whether they’ve heard about the shooting or even whether they know Jean or Guyger’s name. To serve, jurors can’t have an opinion about Guyger’s guilt or innocence.

The trial is scheduled to start Sept. 23. Jury selection is slated to begin on the first anniversary of Jean’s death.

Prosecutor Jason Hermus has not responded to the motion. State District Judge Tammy Kemp signed a gag order preventing attorneys involved in the criminal case from speaking with the media.

Guyger’s attorneys requested that the trial be moved to Collin, Grayson, Kaufman, Ellis, Rockwall or Fannin County.

Public officials weighed in

Guyger’s attorneys argue that several prominent public officials’ comments on the case, along with media coverage, make it impossible for the former Dallas officer to get a fair trial in Dallas County.

Faith Johnson, whose tenure as Dallas County district attorney ended when John Crezuot took office in January, is accused by Guyger’s attorneys of having “perpetuated the pervasive, prejudicial and inflammatory publicity” in the case, they wrote in the motion.

The attorneys said Johnson “poisoned the jury pool” by commenting on the case publicly, pointing to news conferences she spoke at after Guyger’s arrest and indictment, along with Jean’s family.

The attorneys argue that Johnson interfered with Guyger’s right to a fair trial.

The motion also names former Dallas Mayor Mike Rawlings, U.S. presidential candidate Beto O’Rourke and state Sen. Royce West as officials who “injected themselves into the case.”

The attorneys write that media outlets pushed the false narrative that “merely because … [Guyger] is white and Mr. Jean was black, the incident must have been racial in nature.”

They pushed back against that notion, saying Guyger mistakenly entered an apartment she thought was hers and had “no idea” who was inside.

“There is no evidence showing that defendant knew that a black man lived in that apartment,” they wrote in the motion. “There is no evidence showing that defendant knew that a person in that apartment was smoking marijuana. And certainly, neither defendant nor her attorneys had anything to do with the discovery of marijuana in Mr. Jean’s apartment or the dissemination of this fact to the media.”

The motion mostly cites area media coverage. But it also cites national coverage, which would have been seen locally, statewide and nationally, such as an episode of The View during one of the hosts, Whoopi Goldberg, said that if Jean had shot Guyger, Jean “would be somewhere hanging now,” according to the defense motion.

“This is inflammatory and utter nonsense,” the motion states. “There is no known situation in recent memory where a black man is alleged to have killed a police officer and the suspect was lynched.”

Most high-profile cases remain in Dallas

There aren’t a large number of cases that get moved in Dallas. Anecdotally, trials are moved out of the county more often when prosecutors seek the death penalty. But even the vast majority of death penalty cases remain in the county.

The Office of Court Administration, which collects statistics on Texas courts, doesn’t track changes of venue in criminal courts.

Area attorneys could recall only two changes of venue granted for Dallas County cases in a little more than 20 years. Darlie Routier killed her two young sons in Rowlett in 1996. Her trial was moved to Kerr County, northwest of San Antonio. The jury sent her to death row, where she remains.

The trial of one of the Texas 7 prison escapees, Michael Rodriguez, who killed Irving Officer Aubrey Hawkins on Christmas Eve 2000 was moved to East Texas. Rodriguez was executed.


No posts to display


  1. It is evident that many people just make statements without knowing or even thinking about the law. I had said in a previous post that many things which were being done in St. Lucia and the US by the family of Botham would ultimately impact the right to a free trial for his murderer. Those words went unheeded by the growing crowd of St. Lucians who restricted by their inability to separate emotions from decision making were making all kinds of pronouncements such as "Justice for Botham" as if the US Justice System like St. Lucia's had stopped working.

    I also said that we need to give the people time to investigate and present a case, however, there were marches, media blitzes and all types of statements being made. That's why it is no surprise to me that the media campaign seemed to be more detrimental than beneficial to the case. The defense has argued among other things the motion also alleges that attorneys for the Jean family released information before it was made public and "attempted to encourage the prime minister of St. Lucia (Mr. Jean's home-country) to engage the United States government and say, 'Our citizen was killed in your country in an unbelievable way, and we are looking to you to make sure that justice is done" (This was left out of the above report).

    For this same reason i encouraged officials not to get involve since it was an active case and we should be careful of the sentiments that we portray out there. We in St. Lucia have done the same in the Kimberly De Leon case. Recently key witneses (propective) in the case were talking about evidence on the crime scene. This is also happeneing with the case of the young who was killed in a vehicle by the police. The media is insisting that police either repeat or give difinitive satatements to the public as to what happened. That is not the role of the police as they can only offer their rationale to the DPP and then to the Judge. Any statement made in public has a great impact on the trial of the case and i hope the media understands its role in the governance of information.


Comments are closed.