Amber Guyger didn’t commit a crime when she killed Botham Jean, investigator says — but jurors won’t hear that

Amber Guyger didn’t commit a crime when she killed Botham Jean, investigator says — but jurors won’t hear that
Amber Guyger (left) and Texas Ranger David Armstrong
Amber Guyger (left) and Texas Ranger David Armstrong

(WFAA) — Former Dallas police officer Amber Guyger reasonably believed she was shooting an intruder in her apartment when she shot and killed 26-year-old Botham Jean, the lead investigator of the case said Wednesday.

Guyger, 31, is charged with murder in the death of her upstairs neighbor. She was off duty but still in uniform when she mistakenly went to Jean’s apartment instead of her own. She was able to get inside because the door was unlocked and not properly latched.

Defense attorneys say Guyger shot Jean in self-defense believing he was an intruder advancing on her when she entered the apartment.

Texas Ranger David Armstrong said Wednesday that he doesn’t believe Guyger committed any crime, including murder, manslaughter or criminally negligent homicide.

“I believe that she did perceive him as a deadly threat,” Armstrong said. “I don’t believe it was reckless or criminally negligent based on the totality of the investigation.”

But jurors won’t get to hear that.

The jury was outside the courtroom when defense attorney Robert Rogers questioned Armstrong, who was called to the witness stand by prosecutors. Armstrong testified briefly Tuesday afternoon and was still on the stand when court resumed Wednesday.

Rogers wanted to question Armstrong about his opinions on whether Guyger reasonably believed she was in her own apartment and where he believed Jean was standing when he was shot.

Jean had been sitting on his couch eating vanilla ice cream topped with crumbled cookies watching TV moments before the shooting. Prosecutors allege Jean was barely getting up from the couch when Guyger walked into his home and shot him.

Defense attorneys say he was walking toward Guyger when she shot.

Body-camera footage showing the first officers arriving in the apartment captured images of the still-alive Jean with his head near the end of his couch and his feet in between the living room and kitchen area. His sandals appeared to have fallen off his feet.

State District Judge Tammy Kemp re-watched the footage to see whether Armstrong could testify about his opinions on where Jean was standing when he was shot.

Armstrong said he believed Jean was shot standing in the position where his sandals were found.

Jean’s family was still in the courtroom when the video was played. They had left the courtroom Tuesday before it was played for jurors.

Jean’s father, Bertram Jean, put his head against the wall and put his hands over his ears. Allison Jean, Botham Jean’s mother, hung her head for several minutes before the couple got up to leave the courtroom.

Allison Jean could barely contain her sobbing as she left the courtroom.

Kemp looked up in surprise after realizing the family was in the room.

“Oh, I’m so sorry,” she said.

The courtroom could occasionally hear wailing outside whenever the door opened.

Prosecutor Jason Hermus argued that Armstrong’s testimony was “inappropriate.” He said the jury has to decide for themselves whether the shooting was reasonable.

Kemp decided defense attorneys could not question Armstrong about whether he thought the shooting was reasonable and said she doesn’t believe anyone could conclusively say where Jean was when he was shot based on the body-camera footage.

Several officers were gathered around Jean, and Kemp said that movement could’ve pushed the sandals around.

The Jean family returned before the jury was brought back into the courtroom.


No posts to display


  1. She's a murderer. She needs to spend life in prison so cops don't start doing this on a regular basis then using the "Amber Guyger defense". I personally think she was drunk or high on something.


    • If she was drunk or high, they would have been able to determine that easily. Also, she had just finished a shift at work. :::major eyeroll:::


  2. Big question!At what point did amber(evil)guyger realize she was in wrong apartment?
    1.was it immediately after she shot him
    2.was it one minute two or three minutes
    ...apparantly her first instinct was to call her phuck buddy and give him the run down.....was this really the turn of events or a staged defence?


  3. Why is it the despatcher never ask about the condition of the victim, she said that information is sent to police and emergency personnel , why she never ask if he is breathing, losing blood ECT. So at least the emergency team would have an idea as to what is going on. Amber wasn't interested in talking about his condition at all , just her fate. Her job and why she shot him. If you thought you were in the wrong apartment why didn't you shout reeze and then he would reply , then you would realise that you were in the wrong apartment. But instead you walked in and saw him, felt trigger happy and fired. This was what they thought you as a police officer?Murderer blood on your hands


      • So mr Armstrong close your eyes and ask yourself if you had done this to a white woman or man do you think that let's say amber was the ranger that she would say that you did nothing wrong or if someone walked into your house and killed a family member because they thought they was at there home and because they were a officer how would you feel then this woman was caught up in what time Martin was cummin and the pleasure he was gonna give her point blank


      • She's guilty of murder in my eyes , as we all know. There is light from the tv she had to have known she was in the wrong apartment plus the way the bullet entered his chest he didn't even get up off the couch , she claimed he was walking towards her plus she was more worried about her job and herself rather then trying to save him , not to mention texting her partner twice while on the phone with 911 .I smell a cover up because cops will always protect their own right or wrong, let their be justice for this poor man


Comments are closed.