Acting PM responds to Chastanet

14
Acting PM responds to Chastanet
Minister Pierre
Minister Pierre

Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Infrastructure Phillip Pierre has responded to recent requests by United Workers Party Leader Allen Chastanet for public disclosure on the status of projects at the Hewanorra Airport.

Chastanet had called for clarification regarding the circumstances behind a contract recently awarded for the construction of a private jet terminal at the Hewanorra International Airport (HIA), and “full disclosure” on the monies collected on behalf of and used on the Airport Development Project.

But according to Pierre, “the answers to these questions have been in the public domain for some time and Mr. Chastanet may have not heard or was simply not interested”.

In his press statement, Pierre accused the UWP leader of “attempting to cast aspersions” on the government regarding these projects.

With regards to the HIA project, Pierre said that financing was never secured for the venture due to the financier’s refusal to grant monies amidst concerns about Asphalt and Mining (A&M) – one of the businesses proposed for the consortium to handle the project.

“When in opposition, the Saint Lucia Labour Party’s position on the Hewanorra International Airport Project was always clear. We had serious concerns on the procurement process and particularly the involvement of Asphalt and Mining in a proposed consortium in the finance build arrangement. Secondly, the Saint Lucia Labour Party believed that due to the fiscal situation and the debt portfolio of the country expenditure of half a billion dollars on one project was excessive,” the release said.

“The fears of the Saint Lucia Labour Party were validated when the proposed financier refused to be part of the arrangement if A & M was part of the consortium…. The truth is there was never any finance secured for the H.I.A. project,” the release said.

Pierre went on the state that government has requested that the Saint Lucia Air and Seaport Authority (SLASPA) prepare a comprehensive report on the HIA project, to include “a full review of the procurement process… comparative options for the concepts of the airport terminal, advise on all possible options for the financing of the project and consider the plashed approach of development to assist in the management of debt if that we to be an option considered.”

“To date the government of Saint Lucia is aware that the council and management of SLASPA have completed the aforementioned tasks and are in the process of submitting the findings and recommendation to their respective ministers for review, deliberation of cabinet and a policy decision from the GOSL,” the release stated.

With respect to the Airport Development Charge (ADC) Chastanet had asked “Where is the money presently and how much of it, if any, has been spent and on what? It is true that a direct award has been given for the resurfacing of the runway at the Hewanorra International Airport?”

In response Pierre’s said that as at June 30, 2013 the total monies collected by the IATA for SLASPA stands at $54.1 million of which none have been used. These monies, according to him, are currently in an interest bearing account held by the Port Authority.

“The Airport Development Charge was reduced to zero by the government earlier this year, a promise made during the 2011 election campaign,” the statement informed.

On the issue of resurfacing the runway at HIA the minister’s statement said that there has been no direct award of contract.

“The government of Saint Lucia is aware and SLASPA has confirmed that there is an urgent need to address the deterioration of the runway at Hewanorra International Airport. A consultancy was undertaken and presently the design and tender documents are being prepared. The work will be done in two stages. Firstly, the sealing of cracks on the runway and secondly the full resurfacing of the runway. A request for proposals for the sealing has been published in local newspapers. Regarding the resurfacing a request for proposals (tender) will be published shortly. The truth is no direct award has been awarded to any company for the resurfacing at the Hewanorra Airport,” the statement said.

“It is unfortunate that Mr. Chastanent on one hand is asking for a change in political ethos of the country but chooses in the same address to deliberately contort stories that he is well aware are untrue and misleading,” Pierre stated.

(0)(0)

No posts to display

14 COMMENTS

  1. If we had kept the tax we would have had the finance to build our airport cash by now. Myopic, morons. You will give your hacks 59 million to pave the runway, then spend another 80 million to repair the roof, another 10 million to repair the air-condition unit. Does that make any economic sense to you when we could have had a state of the art airport for 300 million? Nevertheless there is a good god above. Two years and counting, 1 billion spent and nothing to show. Keep doing what you doing Labour Party buffoons.

    (0)(0)

  2. you SLPs Kenny and company will piss in your eyes and you still think is water and even drink it. 54.1 million isn't that a clear proof that the project would have paid for itself? it is because of the embarrassment to you SLP boy the amount of monies you all saw collected you stop the project and it was not conceived by you all. Kenny hate vieux fort people he want them to remain in the wilderness, Kenny let gods people go.

    (0)(0)

  3. This is a bit confusing.

    The response is "The truth is no direct award has been awarded to any company for the resurfacing at the Hewanorra Airport"

    The allegation was "Chastanet had called for clarification regarding the circumstances behind a contract recently awarded for the construction of a private jet terminal at the Hewanorra International Airport (HIA),"

    Is the private jet terminal contract different from the airport resurfacing.

    Chastanet did ask "It is true that a direct award has been given for the resurfacing of the runway at the Hewanorra International Airport?”" His wording is clumsy and it probably should have been a question "Is it true ..."

    (0)(0)

  4. If we collected $54.1 million dollars from the Airport Development Charge (ADC) do we realize how much could have been collected had we not zero the charge. I really don't understand why it was removed just to fulfill an campaign promise?????!!!!

    (0)(0)

    • The same people who are complaining about VAT all of a sudden wants to pay more tax.
      What a bunch of hypocrites.

      (0)(0)

  5. we lucian just need to learn our lesson well and i mean well and we must stop attacking one another when we are not the problem the problem lies with the socall good people we elect to office and we keep saying that they will do good how the fork they will do good i dont see how it will happen because if u dress a pig its still the same forking pig

    (0)(0)

  6. one of them to be blame for the mess st lucia found itself,Chastenet is preying on peoples mind Especially during this rough economic moments,He is to be blame as tourism minister, How much money did he gave to the florida Caribbean cruise association for bringing them to st lucia. before he start asking question he needs to answer question.

    (0)(0)

  7. he is desperate, will say or do anything to see if he can get elected, he has been a liar, looks phony, will continue to prey on poor people, Especially during this worldwide global recession.

    (0)(0)

  8. YOUR STATEMENT HERE DOESN'T HOLD ANY GROUND YOU GUYS JUST.. UP THE WHOLE COUNTRY ST LUCIA AND SLP MUST GO NOW.CHASTNET IS RIGHT LOOK NOW YOU GUYS ARE ATTACKING MR FRANCOIS.What next.

    (0)(0)

Comments are closed.